On May 2, 2011, Prime Minister Stephen Harper won a majority government in Canada. I thought I'd like to do a piece on the journey of a party which seems has gone FULL CIRCLE , and the period of time it took to bring it about. As the saying goes, once upon a time, and in a country just north of the great USofA there was in Canada a Conservative majority government. It's important to understand as one considers the political spectrum of parties, things of the same name may have different meaning from country to country. To explain the United States of America has the Republican Party which are known to be conservatives. One should not consider the Conservative Party of Canada as sharing exactly the same values as the U.S. Republicans.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b58f5/b58f5f95d0ddb557bd20526987f548d1957a5ebf" alt=""
Stage 1 >> In 1984 Prime Minister Brian Mulroney scored the highest majority government taking 211 seats a compared to the Liberals 40 and the NDP labour party taking 30.
Stage 2 >> In the next election of 1988, the Conservatives under Mulroney win another comfortable majority albeit somewhat reduced. They captured 169 seats with the Liberals taking 83 and the NDP 43.
Stage 3>> The next election was 1993. Mulroney had saw his popularity began to wane, resigned as the party head and a leadership convention was called. The first female leader of the party Kim Cambell was brought in. Her acceptance speech ----> http://bit.ly/k5USkS The popularity of the party once again began to soar and polls indicated that she'd do well and perhaps also win a majority. Certain blunders were made by Cambell that one can read about here on Wik http://bit.ly/9jl6u7 which the opposition, Jean Chretien of the Liberals were able to capitalize on, thus causing the Conservatives to be devastated. The Conservative seat count went from 169 to a dismal 2, essentially wiping out the party.
Stage 2 >> In the next election of 1988, the Conservatives under Mulroney win another comfortable majority albeit somewhat reduced. They captured 169 seats with the Liberals taking 83 and the NDP 43.
Stage 3>> The next election was 1993. Mulroney had saw his popularity began to wane, resigned as the party head and a leadership convention was called. The first female leader of the party Kim Cambell was brought in. Her acceptance speech ----> http://bit.ly/k5USkS The popularity of the party once again began to soar and polls indicated that she'd do well and perhaps also win a majority. Certain blunders were made by Cambell that one can read about here on Wik http://bit.ly/9jl6u7 which the opposition, Jean Chretien of the Liberals were able to capitalize on, thus causing the Conservatives to be devastated. The Conservative seat count went from 169 to a dismal 2, essentially wiping out the party.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/325eb/325ebcfec16ca4546a01562fc4dfa21bc1c2def5" alt=""
The big problem in Florida was taking place, counting the ballots, and the hanging chads and many Americans felt the candidates had hit a new low in being disrespectful of each other. I thought at the time, the Americans are good at many things but holding disrespectful elections aren't one of them. In our 2000 Canadian election candidates were being demonized by each other, being referred to as being on the dark side and one even accused another of being a cockroach. I didn't recall Bush or Gore demean one another by such derogatory terms. One Canadian newspaper agreed with me in my letter to the editor and published comments that Bush and Gore actually had been pretty respectful. All this had a element of humour about it for as Canadians we tend to pride ourselves as being rather laid back, apologetic not wanting to offend! I guess the gloves slipped off this year though! LOL
Stage 5 >> The election of 2004 saw a major shift in the rebuild of the party. The Canadian Alliance, formerly the Reform Party merged into the new Conservative Party. The Canadian Alliance lost to the Liberals in 2000, and it's leader Stockwell Day was challenged by Stephen Harper in a leadership convention. Harper came out the winner and now led the party into the election of 2004. Liberals took 135 seats, Conservatives 99, the separatist party the Bloc, from Quebec 54 seats, and the NDP [Labour Party] 19.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/238cc/238cccb7dc4d279e67cd8a4b7936442561d2dbd1" alt=""
Stage 7 >> The next election of 2008 saw the Conservatives win once again a minority government but seats are increased from 124 to 143. The Liberal Party dropped significantly from having 103 to 77. It appears they were on the downward slide. A couple of reasons for this a newly elected Liberal leader, Stephane Dion was never really well received by the Canadian people. The blame I'd say didn't totally rest with him, for the party itself still seemed to lack, as some would say, the maturity to lead. Power struggles still seemed to prevail from party members who ran against Dion for it's leadership. Again the results of this 2008 election were as follows : Conservatives 143, Liberals 77, Bloc [the separatist from Quebec] 49, and the NDP 29.
Stage 8 >> The last election, on May 2, 2011 Conservatives are given the nod by the Canadian people to have a majority! They had now come FULL CIRCLE! Stephen Harper took the party through rebuilding, to the ultimate, finally another Conservative majority government. The results were as follows, Conservatives 167 seats, the NDP [Labour Party] 102, the Liberals 34, the Bloc 4, and the Green Party, 1. The Liberals lost a great number of seats sliding down to 34. Another newly elected member of that party, Michael Ignatieff was not well received by the voters. In looking at the Liberal loss of 2008 and that of 2011 there's one thing Dion, and Ignatieff didn't have going for them. [picture below of Ignatieff giving Liberal leader Dion a comforting hug after the loss of 2008. Little did he know he'd need such a hug himself after the election of 2011]
There's a rule of thumb in politics that once a leadership convention of a party is complete it's always best to have the Federal election as soon as possible. In so doing a new leader can still appear fresh, one who hasn't made various gaffes or blunders thus losing their lustre. Neither of these two leaders had that benefit, so could they have done better if their federal elections were sooner? Perhaps.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81293/812931b0cb62efa896f73c189af009c11df98617" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment